The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released its Phase One Report exploring the ethical implications of technology on the accounting, assurance, and finance functions.

The report is the culmination of the first phase of fact-finding work the global ethics standard-setting board initiated in recognition of the pace and magnitude of change caused by disruptive technological innovations. The initial phase of the initiative was led by the IESBA’s Technology Working Group (TWG).

In its findings, the TWG concluded that, generally, the IESBA’s International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code) currently provides high level, principles-based guidance for most technology-related ethics issues that professional accountants and firms might encounter. However, the report cites various findings and sets out recommendations grouped into five key topical areas where material in the Code could be enhanced.

“Over the last few years, the pace, significance and complexity of technology advances, such as machine learning, have given rise to new opportunities and challenges for the accountancy profession,” said Dr. Stavros Thomadakis, IESBA Chair, adding “The effective organization and delivery of services are already undergoing major change. The global accountancy profession will have to recognize and address new ethical challenges in a rapidly changing technological environment. The IESBA Technology Working Group has delivered a comprehensive and informative report in this strategic area. This lays the groundwork for our substantive and timely response to ethical and public interest challenges posed by radical technological change.”

The report also includes other recommendations for the next phase of the initiative, including that the IESBA conducts additional information gathering with respect to the ethical implications of other technological developments such as blockchain, cybersecurity and Internet of Things.

Click here for more information.

All stakeholders are invited to register and participate

Feb 12, 2020 | New York, New York | English

Today, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants^® (IESBA^®) announced the dates for two webinars focused on the recently released Exposure Drafts, with proposals relating to Non-assurance services (NAS) and Fees that further reinforce auditor independence.

Please click below to register and join us for each 60-minute webinar event.

• Tuesday, March 17, 2020 from 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. EST; Overview of Proposed Revisions to the Non-Assurance Services Provisions of the Code

• Thursday, March 19, 2020 from 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. EST; Overview of Proposed Revisions to the Fee-Related Provisions of the Code.   

During the March 17 webinar, the NAS Task Force Chair, Mr. Richard Fleck, will explain the key NAS proposals, including:

• A prohibition on providing NAS to an audit client that is a public interest entity (PIE) if a self-review threat to independence will be created;
• Further tightening of the circumstances in which materiality may be considered in determining the permissibility of a NAS;
• Strengthened provisions regarding auditor communication with those charged with governance (TCWG), including, for PIEs, a requirement for NAS pre-approval by TCWG; and
• Stricter requirements regarding the provision of some NAS, including certain tax and corporate finance advice.

During the March 19 webinar, the Fees Task Force Chair Mr. Ian McPhee, will explain the significant aspects of the fee-related proposals which include:

• A prohibition on firms allowing the audit fee to be influenced by the provision of services other than audit to the audit client;
• In the case of PIEs, a requirement to cease to act as auditor if fee dependency on the audit client continues beyond a specified period; and
• Communication of fee-related information to TCWG and to the public to assist their judgments about auditor independence.

Don’t miss out on this unique opportunity to engage with representatives of the IESBA and learn more about the NAS and fee-related proposals.

The IESBA welcomes feedback on the NAS and Fees EDs from all stakeholders, including investors and other users of financial statements, the corporate governance community, the regulatory and audit oversight community, preparers, firms, national standard setters, IFAC member bodies, academics and others.

The comment deadline for the NAS and Fees Exposure Drafts is May 4, 2020.

If you have any questions, please email Szilvia Sramko at szilviasramko@ethicsboard.org.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB) Auditor Reporting Implementation Working Group (ARIWG) recently published a project update in the form of a Communiqué, which provides an update on the IAASB’s post implementation review (PIR) of the revised auditor reporting standards. The communique also includes other relevant news and information relevant to the IAASB’s PIR.

The Communique does not constitute an authoritative pronouncement of the IAASB, nor does it amend, extend or override the ISAs or other of the IAASB’s International Standards.

for more info, or to view the Communiqué, click here.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released for public comment the Exposure Draft, Proposed Revision to the Code Addressing the Objectivity of Engagement Quality Reviewers. The proposed limited-scope revision to the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code) dovetails with the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB’s) development of proposed International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 2, Engagement Quality Reviews.

The Exposure Draft includes proposed guidance on the application of the conceptual framework in the Code to address the topic of the objectivity of an engagement quality reviewer (EQR), thereby supporting proposed ISQM 2 in addressing the matter of the eligibility of an individual to serve in an EQR role. In particular, the proposed guidance:

• Explains the different types of threat to compliance with the fundamental principle of objectivity that might be created in circumstances where an individual is being considered for appointment as an EQR for a given engagement;
• Sets out factors to consider in evaluating the level of the identified threats; and
• Suggests actions that might be safeguards to address the threats.

The development of the proposal benefited from cooperation with the IAASB within the established coordination framework of the two Boards. The IESBA is proceeding on an accelerated time frame to finalize the proposal in order to align closely with the anticipated finalization of ISQM 2 within 2020.  

Comments on the Exposure Draft are requested by March 16, 2020 from all stakeholders.

About the IESBA

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent global standard-setting board. The IESBA serves the public interest by setting ethics standards, including auditor independence requirements, which seek to raise the bar for ethical conduct and practice for all professional accountants through a robust, globally operable International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards).

The IESBA believes a single set of high-quality ethics standards enhances the quality and consistency of services provided by professional accountants, thus contributing to public trust and confidence in the accountancy profession. The IESBA sets its standards in the public interest with advice from the IESBA Consultative Advisory Group (CAG) and under the oversight of the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB).

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) announces the following new appointments and re-appointments:

New appointments:

• Mrs. Laurie Endsley, United States
• Mr. Richard Huesken, United States

Re-appointments:

• Mr. Hiro Fukukawa, Japan
• Ms. Kim Gibson, United States
• Ms. Caroline Lee, Singapore

Re-appointment as Deputy Chair:

• Mr. Richard Fleck, United Kingdom

"I warmly welcome Laurie Endsley and Richard Huesken to the IESBA. I look forward to the rich experience and diverse perspectives they will bring to our discussions, starting with our March 16-18, 2020 meeting in New York. I am also pleased Richard Fleck will continue to serve as Deputy Chair for another year,” said Dr. Stavros Thomadakis, IESBA Chairman. “Finally, I want to thank our departing members, Alden Leung, Patricia Mulvaney and Sylvie Soulier. Their various contributions to the Board have been significant and we are grateful for their dedication to IESBA and their commitment to the public interest."

The IESBA also welcomes two new technical advisors, Ms. Laura Friedrich from Canada, and Ms. Kristen Wydell from Australia.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants^® (IESBA^®) today released two Exposure Drafts (EDs):

• Proposed Revisions to the Non-Assurance Services Provisions of the Code
• Proposed Revisions to the Fee-Related Provisions of the Code

The EDs are aimed at strengthening the non-assurance services (NAS) and the fee-related independence provisions of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code). The EDs represent a key milestone in two major strategic commitments of the IESBA in its current strategy and workplan.

Among the key changes proposed to the NAS provisions are:

• A prohibition on providing NAS to an audit client that is a public interest entity (PIE) if a self-review threat to independence will be created;
• Further tightening of the circumstances in which materiality may be considered in determining the permissibility of a NAS;
• Strengthened provisions regarding auditor communication with those charged with governance (TCWG), including, for PIEs, a requirement for NAS pre-approval by TCWG; and
• Stricter requirements regarding the provision of some NAS, including certain tax and corporate finance advice.

The NAS ED also includes enhanced guidance to assist firms in evaluating the level of threats to independence when providing NAS to audit clients. 

Among the key proposed changes to the fee-related provisions are:

•  A prohibition on firms allowing the audit fee to be influenced by the provision of services other than audit to the audit client;
• In the case of PIEs, a requirement to cease to act as auditor if fee dependency on the audit client continues beyond a specified period; and
• Communication of fee-related information to TCWG and to the public to assist their judgments about auditor independence.

The Fees ED also includes enhanced guidance on identifying, evaluating and addressing threats to independence in relation to other fee-related matters, including the proportion of fees for services other than audit to the audit fee.

“Auditor independence, in fact and in appearance, is fundamental to public confidence in the financial statement audit, and in turn in the integrity of the entire financial system,” said IESBA Chairman Dr. Stavros Thomadakis. “Our proposals are a timely response to growing public perceptions about the need to reinforce auditor independence, as well as specific concerns from the regulatory community and the Public Interest Oversight Board, especially in relation to audits of PIEs. The more stringent provisions concerning the offer of NAS to PIE audit clients, as well as  the transparency and other substantive proposals concerning fees, further raise the bar on auditor independence in the public interest.”

The development of the proposals in the two EDs has benefited from cooperation with the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) within the established coordination framework of the two Boards. The IESBA is strongly committed to continuing its engagement with the IAASB in finalizing the proposals.

The IESBA will host webinars during the comment period to provide an overview of the NAS and Fees EDs. Follow the IESBA on Twitter (@Ethics_Board) for updates on how to register for these events.

The IESBA welcomes feedback on the NAS and Fees EDs from all stakeholders, including investors and other users of financial statements, the corporate governance community, the regulatory and audit oversight community, preparers, firms, national standard setters, IFAC member bodies, academics and others.

How to Comment 

The IESBA invites all stakeholders to comment on the NAS and Fees EDs by visiting the IESBA’s website. Comments are requested by June 4, 2020 (Due to the COVID-19 pandemic the original comment deadline of May 4 has been extended to June 4).

About the IESBA
The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent global standard-setting board. The IESBA serves the public interest by setting ethics standards, including auditor independence requirements, which seek to raise the bar for ethical conduct and practice for all professional accountants through a robust, globally operable International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards).

The IESBA believes a single set of high-quality ethics standards enhances the quality and consistency of services provided by professional accountants, thus contributing to public trust and confidence in the accountancy profession. The IESBA sets its standards in the public interest with advice from the IESBA Consultative Advisory Group (CAG) and under the oversight of the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB).

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) today released Revisions to Part 4B of the Code to Reflect Terms and Concepts Used in ISAE 3000 (Revised). Part 4B of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (the Code) comprises the independence standards for assurance engagements other than audit and review engagements.

The revision fulfills a commitment the IESBA announced in its Strategy and Work Plan, 2019-2023 to review and change Part 4B of the Code to make the part’s provisions  consistent with the revised assurance terms and concepts in the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB’s) International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information.

The main revisions, developed in coordination with the IAASB, include:

• Changes in key terminology, including a revised definition of the term “assurance client”;
• Amendments to certain independence requirements in light of the revised assurance client definition;
• Greater clarity as to the parties to an assurance engagement and their roles and responsibilities, and the related independence requirements that apply; and
• A clearer distinction between the types of assurance engagement covered in Parts 4A (addressing independence for audit and review engagements) and 4B of the Code.

“It is in the public interest that Part 4B of the Code is consistent with ISAE 3000 (Revised), clear on the applicable independence requirements and, most importantly, sufficiently robust and practicable for assurance practitioners in the field,” said IESBA Chairman Dr. Stavros Thomadakis. “The successful completion of this project reflects the IESBA’s strong commitment towards enhanced communication and coordination with the IAASB, to better serve the needs of stakeholders in today’s global economy.”

About the IESBA

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is an independent global standard-setting board. The IESBA serves the public interest by setting ethics standards, including auditor independence requirements, which seek to raise the bar for ethical conduct and practice for all professional accountants through a robust, globally operable International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards).

The IESBA believes a single set of high-quality ethics standards enhances the quality and consistency of services provided by professional accountants, thus contributing to public trust and confidence in the accountancy profession. The IESBA sets its standards in the public interest with advice from the IESBA Consultative Advisory Group (CAG) and under the oversight of the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB).

The IPSASB held its fourth meeting of 2019 from December 10-13, 2019 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. The Department of Finance of Abu Dhabi generously hosted the meeting.

The Public Interest Committee, the body that oversees the standard setting activities of the IPSASB, has launched a public survey on IPSASB governance arrangements. All interested stakeholders are encouraged to participate in this global consultation by February 24, 2020.

Revenue with Performance Obligations
The IPSASB approved ED 70, Revenue with Performance Obligations, and agreed on an exposure period of six months from the date of publication. ED 70 is based on IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and has been expanded to apply to binding arrangements which are not necessarily contractual. ED 70 also has a broadened scope with a greater emphasis on the transfer of goods or services to third-party beneficiaries.

This ED, together with EDs 71and 72, is expected to be published at the end of February 2020. EDs 71 and 72 will have the same exposure period.

Please register on the IPSASB website to ensure that you receive updates when this document and EDs 71 and 72 (see below) are published: https://www.ifac.org/user/register

Access Presentation >>

Revenue Without Performance Obligations
The IPSASB approved ED 71, Revenue without Performance Obligations. ED 71 updates IPSAS 23, Revenue from Non-Exchange Transactions (Taxes and Transfers). It addresses revenue that arises from binding arrangements with present obligations which are not performance obligations, and revenue not related to binding arrangements. 

Access Presentation >>

Transfer Expenses
The IPSASB approved ED 72, Transfer Expenses. Transfer expenses are transactions where an entity transfers resources to another party without directly receiving anything in return.

The accounting for transfer expenses with performance obligations mirrors the accounting for revenue with performance obligations in ED 70. ED 72 does not mirror ED 71, however, as where there are no performance obligations it requires an expense to be recognized immediately. ED 72 does not address taxation.
Access Presentation >>

Leases
The IPSASB revisited the objective and scope of the Leases project and evaluated options for moving the project forward against specified criteria. The IPSASB will continue its work on refining the criteria to analyze options and intends to decide on the approach in March 2020.

Access Presentation >>

Improvements
The IPSASB discussed the responses to ED 68, Improvements to IPSAS, 2019. The IPSASB approved the amendments proposed in ED 68 with no significant changes. The IPSASB also agreed to an effective date of January 1, 2021 for these improvements, except for improvements related to IPSAS 41, Financial Instruments, which will have an effective date of January 1, 2022 to align with the effective date of that standard.

Access Presentation >>

Measurement
The IPSASB carried out a preliminary review of responses to the Consultation Paper, Measurement.  A number of the issues were raised by respondents related to fair value, including:

• The meaning of fair value in existing IPSAS;
• The interaction of fair value with market value;
• The appropriateness of highest and best use in the public sector; and
• Inconsistency between replacement cost as a measurement basis and a measurement technique to estimate fair value.

The IPSASB also discussed its preliminary view to expense borrowing costs, rather than capitalizing them, noting respondents were split in their views. The IPSASB instructed staff to bring a recommendation forward for its consideration in March 2020.
Access Presentation >>

Infrastructure Assets
The IPSASB approved the flowchart  for determining whether additional guidance is needed and, if so, whether it should be authoritative or non-authoritative. The flowchart was tested by analyzing issues related to the separation of land under or over infrastructure assets, the control of such land and valuation. The IPSASB instructed staff to revise the draft additional guidance, so that it addresses all the financial reporting issues impacting the accounting for land under or over infrastructure assets. The revised draft guidance will be considered at the March 2020 meeting. 

Access Presentation >>

Meeting Podcast
A podcast highlighting key points of the December 2019 meeting is now available here.

Next Meeting
The next meeting of the IPSASB will be in New York from March 10-13, 2020. For more information, or to register as an observer, visit the IPSASB website.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) today released International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 315 (Revised 2019), its revised standard for identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement. 

ISA 315 (Revised 2019) is an important part of the IAASB’s efforts to improve audit quality globally. In finalizing the changes, the IAASB focused on the understandability, complexity and length of the standard, and made enhancements and clarifications to encourage a more consistent and robust risk assessment, which forms the foundation of the auditor’s efforts to gather sufficient appropriate audit evidence. The revisions also modernize the standard to keep up with the evolving environment in which businesses operate, in particular in relation to technology, as well as a focus on why procedures are required.

“This revised standard is the second significant standard to be completed in our efforts to enhance audit quality. ISA 315 (Revised 2019) is foundational to the audit – the core of the audit is undertaking work to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to address the risks of material misstatement, and the changes made to ISA 315 (Revised 2019) recognize the importance of a robust and consistent risk assessment in driving an appropriate and effective response to those risks,” says Tom Seidenstein, IAASB Chair. 

ISA 315 (Revised 2019) becomes effective for financial statement audits for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2021.

Due to the foundational nature of this revised standard, the IAASB will undertake activities to support effective and consistent application of the changes. An implementation plan has been developed which lays out the planned activities and estimated timing.

About the IAASB
The IAASB develops auditing and assurance standards and guidance for use by all professional accountants under a shared standard-setting process involving the Public Interest Oversight Board, which oversees the activities of the IAASB, and the IAASB Consultative Advisory Group, which provides public interest input into the development of the standards and guidance. The structures and processes that support the operations of the IAASB are facilitated by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). For copyright, trademark, and permissions information, please go to permissions or contact permissions@ifac.org.

The Public Interest Committee, the body that oversees the standard setting activities of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB), today launches a public Survey on IPSASB governance arrangements which were implemented in accordance with the 2015 Recommendations of the IPSASB Governance Review Group. All interested stakeholders are encouraged to participate in this global consultation.

Established in 2015, the Public Interest Committee reviews the standard-setting activities of the IPSASB to ensure appropriate due process and that the Board’s activities reflect the public interest. Since its formation, the Committee has actively provided advice and recommendations concerning the development of the IPSASB strategy and work program, the appointment process for members of the IPSASB, and IPSASB standard-setting due process. 

Stakeholder feedback through the survey will be an important source of input for the Public Interest Committee in carrying out the review of the current oversight arrangements of the IPSASB.

Responses to the Survey on IPSASB governance arrangements are invited by February 24, 2020.