High-quality reporting should transparently demonstrate how organizations preserve and create value over time. As a global advocate for integrated reporting, IFAC’s 2017 annual review is designed to offer information on our financial, human, social and intellectual capitals alongside our strategic objectives, governance arrangements and financial highlights. It also describes how we strengthen organizations and enhance economies by supporting and empowering our member organizations and the global accountancy profession in the public interest.

This review is part of our 2017 suite of reporting, which also comprises our Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. With this annual review, we are continuing a journey of more fully implementing the integrated reporting principles and concepts IFAC advocates for globally—those set out in the International Integrated Reporting Council’s Integrated Reporting Framework.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has started the consultation process about its future strategy. Today it releases a Strategy Survey to seek views and insights from its stakeholders on emerging developments and trends that are likely to be important to its 2020-2023 strategy.

The survey serves as an important tool to help identify key issues for consideration in developing its future strategy in the context of the IAASB’s broad strategic focus and the changing environment, and with the overriding objective of serving the public interest.

The input from the survey will help inform the development of a Consultation Paper on the IAASB’s 2020-2023 strategy, expected to be published at the end of 2018. 

The IAASB is looking to obtain the views of its stakeholders on areas of future focus as the IAASB continues its work on current projects, including revisions of the standards on auditing accounting estimates; identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement; and quality control for firms and audit engagements, and undertakes work on agreed upon procedures engagements and emerging forms of external reporting. 

The IAASB seeks input from all interested stakeholders. The survey will remain open until July 24, 2018. French and Spanish translations will be available on the IAASB's website next week.

Small- and medium-sized practices (SMPs) in a digital, globalized world need to adopt "good practices" to best serve their clients. IFAC (International Federations of Accountants) has released an updated publication—the Guide to Practice Management for Small- and Medium-Sized Practices Fourth Edition (the Guide) to help SMPs meet this challenge. The Guide will help SMPs improve their management and operational efficiency and support their sustainability and success.

Now in its fourth edition, the Guide is organized into eight stand-alone modules, including a new module on Leveraging Technology. The revised Guide addresses a comprehensive range of topics including:

• Strategic planning;
• Managing staff;
• Client relationship management;
• Risk management; and
• Succession planning.

The new Leveraging Technology module covers how technology developments are fundamentally changing the way organizations operate and recognizes that SMPs must adapt to service their clients that utilize technology. Included are topics such as developing a technology strategy, hardware and software options, technology risks, new and emerging technologies, and leveraging technology for practice innovation.

In order to help IFAC member organizations and practices maximize the Guide’s use, IFAC has updated the Companion Manual, which provides suggestions on making best use of the Guide.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants^® (IESBA^®) seeks public comment by August 15, 2018 on its consultation paper, Professional Skepticism – Meeting Public Expectations.

In response to regulatory and other stakeholder feedback on the topic, the paper explores:

1. 1. The behavioral characteristics comprised in professional skepticism;
   2. Whether all professional accountants should apply these behavioral characteristics; and
   3. Whether the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) should be further developed to address behaviors associated with the exercise of appropriate professional skepticism.

Through this initiative, the IESBA also aims to reinforce the effective exercise of professional skepticism by auditors.

The consultation paper was developed following close coordination with the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and the International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB), and with advice from the IESBA Consultative Advisory Group.

The paper will form the basis for discussion with a wide range of stakeholders at a series of three global roundtables in Washington, DC, USA on June 11; Paris, France on June 15; and Tokyo, Japan on July 12.

To access the consultation paper and submit a comment by August 15^th, please visit.

IFAC (International Federation of Accountants) commissioned Gibson Dunn, a leading global law firm, to perform an independent qualitative and quantitative analysis of the public responses to the Consultation Paper published by the Monitoring Group: Strengthening the Governance and Oversight of the International Audit-related Standard-setting Boards in the Public Interest.

A large number of responses were received from stakeholders from around the world.

• The 179 responses included investors, standard setters, government auditors, regulators, researchers, individuals, accounting firms and professional organizations from a wide range of geographies.
• In any consultation, the input from all respondents must be considered. It should be noted that 74 professional accountancy organizations, or 41 percent of all respondents, felt strongly enough to provide comments. Notably, the overall, main conclusions from the report remained intact even when responses from these accountancy organizations were removed from the analysis.

The Gibson Dunn analysis highlighted marked differences of opinion across geographies and stakeholder groups on key proposals, but included several overall, main conclusions:

• Respondents generally criticized the premise of the Consultation Paper, namely that there are major concerns with the current standard-setting process. Respondents also expressed concern that a Public Interest Framework to evaluate change has not yet been issued and agreed.
• Respondents generally expressed skepticism regarding the broader governance changes proposed by the Consultation Paper.
• Respondents provided significant support for some operational changes proposed in the Consultation Paper.

After carefully reviewing the report IFAC has the following observations:

Broad support and agreement for any Public Interest Framework is necessary before any of the broader governance changes proposed can be properly assessed.

• While there was virtually universal agreement that any changes must be in the public interest, there was significant criticism that the proposed Public Interest Framework has not been released for consultation.
• The Public Interest Framework, agreed by stakeholders, should include multi stakeholder composition of both the standards boards and their oversight bodies, and should provide the umbrella within which all significant proposals can be evaluated and agreed as an integrated package by key stakeholders.

Seeking consensus on proposals which could have a significant global impact depends not only on the merits of the proposals but also on the way the process is conducted; a new multi stakeholder approach is needed.

• The way forward should be under the direction of a multi stakeholder group that will engage all key stakeholders in a broad, open and collaborative dialogue.
• The need for this multi stakeholder group is reinforced not only by the multi stakeholder elements that should undoubtedly form part of the Public Interest Framework but also by the differences of opinion that currently exist across geographies and stakeholder groups.
• Without this approach global agreement and international acceptance is unlikely.

Change and transition can bring significant disruption and risk that must be mitigated.

• Any steps taken must not jeopardize the existing widespread adoption of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) standards, their acknowledged high quality, or the standard boards’ current work plans.
• This concern is particularly relevant at a time when the standard-setting process must deal in a timely way with the impact of changes to complex accounting standards, as well as a rapidly changing technology and audit environment.
• Any changes proposed must be justified on a cost/benefit basis and have widespread international support, particularly as there is general agreement among respondents on the absence of significant problems with the current standard-setting processes.
• Forming a multi stakeholder group to take the process forward should assist in mitigating disruption and risk.

Steps to improve operational processes can and should be taken quickly.

• There is strong support for some operational changes.
• IFAC takes its responsibility to support the operations of the independent standard-setting boards very seriously.
• IFAC is reviewing identified operational areas with IAASB and IESBA leadership and other stakeholders to determine the actions they would agree can be taken now to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the operations of the two boards in the public interest.

IFAC intends to actively engage with all stakeholders to seek a revised approach to improve the standard-setting process, that responds constructively to the feedback received, and that is:

• Grounded in a Public Interest Framework that needs to be agreed as a first step in the process.
• Under the direction of a multi stakeholder group.
• Designed to minimize disruption and risk.
• Focused on making agreed operational improvements.

IFAC welcomes stakeholders’ reactions to these observations.

Please send any comments to communications@ifac.org.

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) is seeking a highly qualified Technical Director.

Based in New York, the Technical Director position requires deep knowledge of audit and assurance, strong understanding of standard setting, and strong program and people leadership ability. The Technical Director serves a key role in the management of the IAASB, and works closely with the IAASB Chair and Deputy Chair to develop strategy, plan and implement the work program of the Board, and develop positive stakeholder relationships.

The Technical Director’s primary concern is for the quality of the material presented to the IAASB for deliberation and the robustness of the underlying development process. In addition, the Technical Director orchestrates the IAASB’s internal and external activity.

The successful candidate will be self-motivated, dynamic and proactive, and hands-on. He or she will have a strong staff development focus and experience in leading a professional team in a collaborative, multi-cultural environment. The successful candidate will also be confident and competent in dealing with others on technical audit and assurance matters, and effective at identifying technical concerns and developing solutions.

The position requires strong project management skills, both in regard to overseeing program deliverables and in taking initiatives from concept through execution. Strong written and oral communication skills are essential. Additionally, the candidate should be an articulate, confident communicator with stakeholders and media.

The international executive search firm Korn Ferry has been retained for this search. Interested candidates should contact Korn Ferry Practice Leader Arlene Kobayashi or Managing Consultant Liz Lebo.

For reference, the profile for the Technical Director IAASB can be found here. Application deadline closes June 15, 2018

Nearly 80% of jurisdictions worldwide have adopted International Standards for Auditing for mandatory audits, while more than 60% have fully adopted the international Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, according to a new study by IFAC—International Federation of Accountants—on rates of adoption of international standards across 80 of the jurisdictions in which IFAC’s more than 175 member organizations operate.

High-quality international standards are essential pillars of the global financial architecture. Their adoption and implementation improve the availability of the high-quality financial information in the public and private sectors that improves decision making and ultimately results in greater economic growth, development, and accountability.

“This forward momentum is positive news for investors, governments, businesses of all sizes, global regulators and the public given these standards’ relevance to the entire global finance structure,” said Alta Prinsloo, Executive Director, Quality & Development. “Following comparable international standards enable businesses to produce financial information that decision makers can rely on.”

The data is included in a first-of-its kind report that assesses and publically reports on the global status of the adoption of international standards—International Standards: 2017 Global Status Report. The report details the high rates of adoption around the world, driven by IFAC and its member organizations, and positive results in several key areas, including ethics, financial reporting standards, and quality assurance, and provides examples of success and tools for continued progress.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of more than 175 members and associates in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions, representing almost 3 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) seeks public comment by July 16, 2018, on its Proposed Strategy and Work Plan, 2019-2023.

Leveraging the completely rewritten and significantly strengthened International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards), the proposed Strategy and Work Plan projects the IESBA’s vision for the Code in the global economy. The IESBA’s future priorities and actions will be guided by three strategic themes:

• Advancing the Code’s relevance by keeping it fit-for-purpose for a rapidly changing world, and further strengthening ethical conduct and independence standards;
• Deepening and expanding the Code’s impact and influence through increased global adoption and implementation; and
• Enriching the IESBA’s perspectives and capacities through proactive stakeholder dialogue and co-operation.

The consultation paper was developed following extensive, wide-ranging engagement with stakeholders, including regulators, national standard setters and professional accounting organizations.

Please submit your responses by July 16, 2018 to ensure your views are considered.

IFAC, the International Federation of Accountants, today announced its first accountancy capacity building project in Southeast Asia. The project will assist the Myanmar Institute of Certified Public Accountants (MICPA) in its work to strengthen the accountancy profession in Myanmar. IFAC has selected the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) to partner with MICPA on the project.

ACCA will partner with MICPA to build a sustainable professional accountancy organization that can act as the cornerstone of the profession in the country. The project will deliver a strategic plan and new governance structure for MICPA, in consultation with key national stakeholders.

“This project will contribute to Myanmar’s ongoing economic reform in line with the new government’s policy of liberalization, which includes modernizing the accountancy profession,” said Alta Prinsloo, IFAC Executive Director, Quality & Development. “As the first project under this Program in Southeast Asia, it offers opportunity to make a positive impact in the region.”

Myanmar, currently in the process of democratic transition, is one of East Asia’s fastest growing economies. The new government is committed to attracting investment for sustainable growth, and its support of this project demonstrates its recognition of the critical role that the accountancy profession can play in this process.

This project is funded with UK aid from the UK government. In 2014, the UK Department for International Development (DFID) reached an agreement with IFAC to provide funding of almost £5 million for PAO capacity building in at least ten emerging countries over seven years. Projects under the IFAC Capacity Building Program using DFID funding are currently underway in several countries including Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Rwanda and Zimbabwe.  Partner organizations are selected following global Calls for Expressions of Interest and an extensive proposal and review process by the IFAC PAO Capacity Building Program Independent Selection Panel.

About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of more than 175 members and associates in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions, representing almost 3 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.

About DFID
The Department for International Development (DFID) leads the UK’s work to end extreme poverty. We're ending the need for aid by creating jobs, unlocking the potential of girls and women and helping to save lives when humanitarian emergencies hit. For more information visit www.gov.uk/dfid.

About MICPA
The Myanmar Institute of Certified Public Accounts is a professional body of Certified Public Accountants in Myanmar. The mission of the body is to communicate with international accountancy bodies and to distribute information to its members. MICPA was found under the Myanmar Accountancy Council (MAC), a policymaking body of accountants and auditors.