The third Board meeting of the year was held from September 9 to 12, 2025, in Lisbon, Portugal.
Thank you to hosts the Ordem dos Contabilistas Certificados (Order of Certified Accountants) for welcoming the IPSASB back to Lisbon and hosting both the September Board meeting and the 5th Public Sector Standard Setters Forum. The IPSASB also extends its thanks to its members, technical advisors, and standard setters from around the globe who joined the Forum to shape the future of public sector standard setting.
Work Program Consultation
With resources expected to become available in the second half of 2026, the IPSASB approved its Work Program Consultation to ask stakeholders about the most significant needs concerning financial reporting projects, post-implementation reviews, and sustainability reporting projects. The Consultation is expected to be published in October 2025 and will be open for 180 days. Please share your input and feedback on your priorities, so these can be considered in the decision-making process on developing the work program priorities for 2026 and beyond.
IPSAS 33 – Limited Scope Update
The IPSASB approved the updates to improve IPSAS 33, First-time Adoption of Accrual Basis International Public Sector Accounting Standards. These clarifications to the existing requirements make the guidance easier to apply for first-time adopters by emphasizing exemptions available, including adding new illustrative examples and implementation guidance. The pronouncement will be published in Q4 2025, and is effective January 1, 2028, with early adoption permitted.
Definition of Material – Narrow Scope Amendments
The IPSASB approved the Final Pronouncement, Definition of Material (Amendments to IPSAS 1, IPSAS 3, and the Conceptual Framework), enhancing the clarity and consistency of materiality throughout the IPSAS Standards. The amendments to IPSAS Standards are effective January 1, 2027, and amendments to the Conceptual Framework are effective upon publication of the pronouncement, which will occur in Q4 2025.
Natural Resources
The IPSASB has decided that a tangible natural resource held for conservation is a naturally occurring tangible asset that is managed to prevent its degradation. The IPSASB plans to approve the pronouncement during the December 2025 meeting in New York.
Climate-related Disclosures
Following its June 2025 decision to split the project into two separate standards, in September, the IPSASB reviewed the first draft of the IPSASB SRS Standard on Phase 1. The IPSASB agreed there is a need for further materiality guidance and decided to prioritize developing practical implementation support on materiality in a timely manner, following the planned approval of the Phase 1 pronouncement at the December 2025 meeting.
Presentation of Financial Statements
The IPSASB completed all remaining discussions regarding the general presentation requirements and those for the Statement of Changes in Net Assets/Equity. These discussions have allowed the IPSASB to continue progressing the development of most of the Consultation Paper (CP). Next quarter, the Board will tackle the last Chapter of the CP regarding note disclosures and continue developing the illustrative Exposure Draft.
Strengthening Linkages Between IPSAS Standards and GFSM
The IPSASB agreed to develop the non-authoritative guidance to help public sector entities maximize the extent to which they can use IPSAS Standards-based accounting data to compile statistical information. The work will continue next quarter, with the aim of approving the Exposure Draft at the December 2025 meeting.
New and Returning Members
High-quality standards that enhance public financial management and promote sustainable development globally need diverse voices to develop them. The Board continues to reflect broad geographic representation, gender parity, and professional expertise in public sector financial and sustainability reporting. Congratulations to our new and returning members for 2026.
Meeting Videos
Recordings of the meetings are available on our YouTube channel.
Next Meeting
The next IPSASB meeting will be in New York, New York, USA, from December 2-5, 2025.
Building for the Future: Read the IPSASB Biennial Review 2023-2024
The latest Biennial Review is out now: Building for the Future: The IPSASB Biennial Review 2023-2024. Over this review period, the IPSASB completed a number of significant long-running projects and have also finalized its 2024-2028 Strategy and Work Program.
Adoption & Implementation Resource
In collaboration with us, IFAC has published a new resource, Implementing International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS): IFAC Tools, a compilation of our resources designed to help governments and public sector entities adopt and implement IPSAS Standards and help Professional Accountancy Organizations (PAOs) advocate for their use.
The IPSASB held its second meeting of the year from June 10 to 13, 2025, in Toronto, ON, Canada.
At our meeting last week, we continued our analysis of responses to the Climate-related Disclosures and Tangible Natural Resources exposure drafts, and we progressed several other projects that will enhance IPSAS Standards, which provide the cornerstone for effective and efficient public financial management.
Climate-related Disclosures
The helpful stakeholder feedback to IPSASB SRS ED 1, Climate-related Disclosures led us to consider the complexity of having different reporting perspectives included in a single standard. We decided to adopt a phased approach towards developing guidance:
Phase 1, Own Operations, will finalize the first-ever public sector sustainability reporting standard tailored for the public sector that’s already in development, focusing on how public sector entities disclose climate-related risks and opportunities to their own operations.
Phase 2, Public Policy Programs, will develop a separate standard for those specific public sector entities responsible for the outcomes of climate-related public policy programs.
This phased approach will meet the urgent need for public sector guidance while allowing additional time to address the more complex reporting needs identified by stakeholders. Read more about this decision.
Measurement – Application Phase
The Board approved the Final Pronouncement, Amendments to IPSAS Standards as a Result of the Application of IPSAS 46, Measurement, amending IPSAS Standards to align with the measurement principles in IPSAS 46. These amendments are effective January 1, 2028.
Where support for the proposals in the exposure draft was mixed, i.e., the introduction of current operational value in IPSAS 31, Intangible Assets, we decided to continue analysis independently so the otherwise strongly supported guidance could be delivered in a timely manner.
Natural Resources
As part of the development of our final pronouncement, we confirmed the guidance on tangible natural resources will be located in a separate, standalone IPSAS Standard. We also discussed stakeholder feedback and agreed the only tangible natural resources in scope of the proposals were those held for conservation and decided to clarify the guidance.
Presentation of Financial Statements
We made great progress finalizing our preliminary view regarding categorization on the Statement of Financial Performance. We also deliberated presentation requirements regarding main operating activities, totals and subtotals, minimum line items, and expenses by nature or function. We will continue to refine and articulate the nuanced discussions in our forthcoming consultation paper and begin discussions on other presentation requirements.
Work Program Consultation
During Q4 2025, we’ll publish a consultation on our work program to receive your valuable feedback on future priorities in the areas of financial reporting, post-implementation reviews, and sustainability reporting. During the June meeting, we reviewed the first draft of the consultation and expect to approve the document at our September 2025 meeting.
Improvements to IPSAS
We discussed potential clarifications to enhance the consistency of IPSAS 35, Consolidated Financial Statements, and IPSAS 40, Public Sector Combinations. We decided to include the consolidation-related amendments in the next exposure draft on improvements to IPSAS Standards, which collects improvements approved throughout 2025 and is expected to be approved in March 2026. Potential amendments to public sector combinations will be analyzed further at a future IPSASB meeting as a separate narrow scope amendment.
IPSAS 33 – Limited Scope Update
We continued to analyze respondents’ feedback to ED 91, Limited-Scope Updates to First-Time Adoption of Accrual Basis International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). We aim to make the first time adoption standard more user-friendly by improving navigation, clarifying principles, and releasing additional implementation guidance. We intend to approve the revised Standard at the September 2025 meeting.
Public Sector Standard Setters Forum
Save the date: September 7-9, 2025 in Lisbon, Portugal. Register your interest to attend by July 25.
Post-Implementation Reviews
Our first post-implementation review will be on IPSAS 20, Related Party Disclosures. To help inform our next review, we decided to conduct a survey of national standards setters on which IPSAS Standards should be a priority for us based on which pronouncements have been modified before adoption, and/or have not been adopted at the local level.
Meeting Videos
Recordings of the meetings are available on our YouTube channel.
Next Meeting
The next IPSASB meeting will be in Lisbon, Portugal, September 9-12, 2025 and we would like to thank our hosts, the Ordem dos Contabilistas Certificados (Order of Certified Accountants) for welcoming us back again.
In collaboration with us, IFAC has published a new resource, Implementing International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS): IFAC Tools, a compilation of our resources designed to help governments and public sector entities adopt and implement IPSAS Standards and help Professional Accountancy Organizations (PAOs) advocate for their use.
Thank you to The World Bank for hosting the IPSASB®'s first meeting of the year from March 18 to 21 in Washington, D.C., USA.
We progressed several projects that will make our IPSAS® Standards, which are cornerstones of strong public financial management, easier to use and more effective.
Informed decision-making matters.
Reliable financial information supports sound policymaking, enabling governments to allocate resources effectively to achieve their goals.
Strengthening Linkages Between IPSAS Standards and the GFSM
We approved the Project Brief, Strengthening Linkages Between IPSAS Standards and the GFSM, and had an initial discussion on the illustrative examples proposed for the Exposure Draft. We will be updating the examples for our next meeting in June 2025. This project will help governments and public sector entities make the most of IPSAS-based information when preparing statistical data for decision-making and accountability.
Making Materiality Judgements – Limited Scope
We kicked off our project to enhance the clarity and consistent application of the definition of material with two approvals: We approved the Project Brief, Making Materiality Judgements, and a limited-scope Exposure Draft to enhance the consistency of materiality guidance across the IPSASB’s literature. The Exposure Draft is expected to be published in Q2 2025 with a 60-day consultation period.
Sustainability: Climate-related Disclosures
The consultation period for the draft of our inaugural sustainability reporting standard, IPSASB SRS ED 1, Climate-related Disclosures, closed last month with a record number of responses. The Board discussed the outreach efforts undertaken to obtain that feedback along with next steps, including plans to review the feedback to finalize the Climate-related Disclosures Standard.
Presentation of Financial Statements
To continue developing the IPSASB’s Consultation Paper and form our preliminary views, we considered the results of additional analysis on two challenging topics. This work has helped the Board refine its views on the presentation of revenue and expenses on the statement of financial performance and statement of changes in net assets/equity. The Board intends to finalize those views on the different presentation approaches at the next meeting.
Work Program Consultation
Discussions continued on the development of the work program consultation that will be issued later in 2025. This consultation will be used to gather feedback from stakeholders on which financial reporting, post implementation review and sustainability reporting projects the Board should take on next when resources become available.
IPSAS 33 – Limited Scope Update
We reviewed the responses to ED 91, Limited Scope Updates of First-time Adoption of Accrual Basis IPSAS and believe a government that uses IPSAS Standards is better equipped to make sound financial decisions transparently. Constituents strongly supported the reorganized structure and streamlined guidance to make the journey to implementation as easy as possible. We intend to approve a final pronouncement at our next meeting in June 2025.
Measurement – Application Phase
We reviewed responses to ED 90, Amendments to IPSAS as a Result of IPSAS 46, Measurement. Respondents supported including the current operational value measurement basis in IPSAS 12, Inventories, and IPSAS 21, Impairment of Non-Cash Generating Assets, its applicability to right-of-used assets when measured under the current value model in IPSAS 45, Property, Plant, and Equipment, and enhancing the current value disclosures across the IPSAS Standards. The IPSASB will continue its discussion of issues in June 2025.
IPSASB Application Group
We discussed the roll-out of the IPSASB Application Group and the group’s work plan for the remainder of the year. In addition, the IPSASB approved amendments to the financial instruments IPSAS Standards, including guidance on supplier finance arrangements, the classification and measurement of financial instruments, contracts referencing nature-dependent electricity, and other editorial changes. These amendments, as well as other improvements to be discussed later in the year, will be exposed for comment in the second half of 2025.
Post-Implementation Reviews
Our first post-implementation review will be on IPSAS 20, Related Party Disclosures. To help inform our next review, we decided to conduct a survey of national standards setters on which IPSAS Standards should be a priority for us based on which pronouncements have been modified before adoption, and/or have not been adopted at the local level.
Public Sector Standard Setters Forum
Save the date: September 7-9, 2025 in Lisbon, Portugal. Registration coming soon.
Meeting Videos
Recordings of the meetings will be available soon on our YouTube channel. Subscribe to receive a notification when they're uploaded.
Pathways to Accrual: Find resources helpful for planning and undertaking a transition from cash to accrual accounting including adopting and implementing IPSAS.
Implementing IPSAS: Download a package of training materials on IPSAS that can be tailored to the needs of training participants.
Welcome to the sixth Market Scan from the IAASB's Disruptive Technology team. Building on our ongoing work, we issue a Market Scan every 2-3 months. Market Scans cover exciting trends, including new developments, corporate and start-up innovation, noteworthy investments and what it all might mean for the IAASB.
In this Market Scan, we explore Robotic Process Automation, a technology used for executing repetitive tasks that has applications across the audit process, from data transformation to workpaper creation, as well as potential for forming part of an audited entity’s IT environment.
Technology Landscape, September 2022
We cover:
What is Robotic Process Automation and why is it important?
The latest developments
What this might mean for the IAASB
What is Robotic Process Automation and why is it important?
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a technology that involves creating software robots or “bots” to perform repetitive, routine manual tasks, such as extracting data, filling out forms or moving files. By completing rules-based actions that emulate human processes, RPA tools can autonomously complete various activities across multiple unrelated software systems.
What is RPA (Robotic Process Automation)? Two-minute watch, Eye on Tech
What is RPA (Robotic Process Automation)? Two-minute min watch, Eye on Tech
RPA has evolved in recent years with companies such as Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism and UiPath developing ever more sophisticated technologies to automate tasks, workflows and processes. Coupling RPA with artificial intelligence technologies, such as machine learning, has enabled businesses to automate more complex tasks that may involve more judgment or use of unstructured data. This combination of technologies is often referred to as Intelligent Automation or Cognitive Automation.
RPA within the audit process
There are several areas across the audit where RPA can be deployed to drive efficiency in the audit process as well as improve audit quality by enabling consistency of outputs.
Data preparation – combining data sets (e.g., general ledger transactions and trial balance information) and carrying out transformation actions to prepare data for use in automated tools.
Transaction matching and reconciliation – automating the process of matching transactions to external datasets (e.g., bank statements)
Basic documentation – completion of basic standardized documentation, such as workpapers, checklists or templates based on prescribed inputs (e.g., trial balance information or information documented elsewhere in the audit file)
RPA within audited entities
Audited entities may use RPA to support certain business processes or repetitive task activities, such updating records, processing transactions or completing reconciliations.
Benefits of Robotic Process Automation, Digital Beanie
Recent Noteworthy Developments in Robotic Process Automation
These recent developments that may signal future disruption in this area. It is not a complete list of all activities in the field of RPA. For a reminder of Key Venture Capital and Investment terms please refer to the first Market Scan.
1. RPA market experiences slowing growth
The RPA market is dominated by some key players, with the 10 largest RPA vendors accounting for over 75% of the market. There have been some indications in the RPA market that growth in this technology sector may have begun to slow, although double digit growth is still predicted for 2023. UiPath, one of the leading companies in RPA software, has seen its stock value continue to fall since its IPO in 2021. Whilst Automation Anywhere, another well-known RPA provider, sought to secure a $200 million loan and Blue Prism, another large player, agreed to a $1.5 billion takeover offer from Vista Equity Partners in September 2022.
2. Startups with Low-Code and No-Code RPA Solutions
Whilst the traditional RPA industry may be slowing down, business process automation— a term used to describe the use of technologies, including RPA and AI, to streamline and automate more complex business processes—has seen continued growth, particularly with low-code or no-code solutions that can be deployed by those without coding skills.
In May 2022, UiPath announced a new partnership with airSlate, a workflow automation company, to advance the development of workflow solutions to enable individuals and small businesses to digitally transform their organizations.
In June 2022, Next Matter, a workflow automation platform for business operations, raised $16 million in a Series A funding round to expand its team and operations.
In November 2022, Rewst a no-code RPA provider for managed service providers, raised $21.5 million in Series A funding to continue to build out its Robotic Operations Center.
What this might mean for the IAASB
The IAASB is interested in maintaining its collective knowledgebase on digital technologies (including on specific sub-topics such as robotic process automation), promoting digital readiness and enablement through its engagement with stakeholders, and encouraging action by others to supplement and support the IAASB’s standard-setting activities.
The IAASB is also keen to explore how technologies could be used to enhance interaction with auditing standards. Subject to the IAASB’s work plan decisions, possible use cases of digital technologies for audited entities and audit engagements might provide input to further modernize the IAASB’s standards to be adaptable to and reflect the current business and audit environment (while recognizing that the standards would address digital technologies in a principles-based manner).
The increasing accessibility of RPA through the growth of low code and no code technologies offers opportunities for those without extensive programming knowledge to develop solutions to address specific pain points or low value time-consuming activities in their everyday work, including for audit practitioners or audited entities.
Where RPA or other robotics-based technologies are deployed by auditors to complete audit procedures, adequate governance and approval of these technologies needs to be in place to ensure they are designed effectively, fit for purpose and used appropriately, including provision of training or enablement where needed. Availability of no-code or low code technologies may give rise to wider use of small-scale RPA to address specific needs which has the potential to improve audit efficiency but if ungoverned, could impact audit quality.
The use of RPA in audited entities to automate actions previously performed by a person may change how a process and its related controls operate, and therefore the risks within the process and the appropriate audit response, which may include understanding how the use of RPA is being governed and controlled. As the use of this technology develops further, particularly when coupled with artificial intelligence technologies, this may present new challenges for the auditor and may, therefore, have implications for the IAASB’s work, whether in terms of future standard setting related to technology or facilitating or supporting action by others (e.g., developing guidance).
KFC, the popular fast-food chain, experienced a public relations disaster when its automated communications process messaged customers in Germany about a promotion to “commemorate Kristallnacht”. Kristallnacht was a series of Nazi pogroms that took place against German Jews in 1938. The company blamed an error in the automated process which linked calendar events to promotional content.
The IPSASB held its fourth meeting of the year in Toronto, Canada on December 6-9, 2022.
Advancing Sustainability Reporting
The IPSASB is taking its next step to advance sustainability reporting. The IPSASB will commence research and scoping of three potential public sector specific sustainability reporting projects pending securing the resources needed to begin guidance development. Learn more and how to get involved.
The Board approved an updated version of the IPSAS Conceptual Framework: Chapter 7, Measurement of Assets and Liabilities in Financial Statements. The IPSASB will use the updated version of Chapter 7 as part of its process of developing standards going forward.
The updated version of Chapter 7 will be published with the suite of measurement related guidance (IPSAS [X], Measurement, IPSAS [X], Property, Plant, and Equipment). The last piece of this suite of guidance, IPSAS [X], Measurement is planned for approval in March 2023.
ED 78, Property, Plant, And Equipment
The IPSASB approved IPSAS [X], Property, Plant, and Equipment. IPSAS [X] replaces IPSAS 17, Property, Plant, and Equipment and adds public sector guidance on heritage and infrastructure assets and aligns with the new measurement principles.
To align effective dates, IPSAS [X], Property, Plant, and Equipment is expected to be issued in the first half of 2023 together with the suite of measurement related guidance under development.
Measurement
The IPSASB reviewed a final draft of IPSAS [X], Measurement. The IPSASB clarified the concept of deemed cost, including its applicability to property, plant, and equipment held for operational capacity. The IPSASB decided to add a second phase to the Measurement project where it will evaluate the application of current operational value, for specific IPSAS not yet explicitly considered in the first phase Measurement project. The second phase will commence after the planned approval of IPSAS [X], Measurement in March 2023.
Other Lease–Type Arrangements
The IPSASB approved Exposure Draft (ED) 84, Concessionary Leases and Right-of-Use Assets In-kind (Amendments to IPSAS 43 and IPSAS 23). ED 84 will be published in January 2023 for a 4-month comment period, together with a Feedback Statement summarizing the IPSASB’s decisions and thinking related to the feedback received to the January 2021 Request for Information, Concessionary Leases and Other Arrangements Similar to Leases.
Transfer Expenses and Revenue
The IPSASB completed a detailed review of the core text, application guidance, bases for conclusions, and implementation guidance sections in the draft Revenue IPSAS and draft Transfer Expenses IPSAS. In addition, the IPSASB agreed on the list of illustrative examples for both draft IPSAS, and confirmed the proposed approach to finalize amendments to other IPSAS in preparation for the expected approval of both draft standards at the March 2023 meeting.
The IPSASB reviewed four specific matters for comment related to assets and liabilities in ED 81, Conceptual Framework Update, Chapter 3, Qualitative Characteristics and Chapter 5, Elements in Financial Statements. The IPSASB decided, as proposed in ED 81, to:
Adopt the revised definitions of a liability and an asset;
Include restructured guidance that aligns with the components of the liability definition and new guidance on the transfer of resources; and
Adopt the rights-based approach to the guidance on resources in the definition of an asset.
Presentation of Financial Statements
The IPSASB discussed research and scoping activities related to the project on Presentation of Financial Statements, added in 2022 as a result of the Mid-Period Work Program Consultation. The research activities included an update on the feedback received from attendees at the 4th International Public Sector Standards Setters Forum held in September 2022. Research and scoping activities will continue as part of the process to develop and approve a detailed project brief, which is expected to be approved in 2023.
Next Meeting
The next full meeting of the IPSASB will take place in March 2023 in Washington D.C. USA. For more information, or to register as an observer, visit the IPSASB website.
Welcome to the fifth Market Scan from the IAASB's Disruptive Technology team. Building on our previous work, we issue a Market Scan approximately every two to three months. Market Scans cover exciting trends, including new developments, corporate and start-up innovation, noteworthy investments and what it all might mean for the IAASB. Special thanks to Maddie Zietsman for helping to author this edition.
In this Market Scan, we explore Homomorphic Encryptionfor Analyzing Encrypted Data, a technology which has applications within Protecting Information. This technology has the potential to impact how data is used in the audit—creating opportunities for greater collaboration and access to specialist skills.
We cover:
What is Homomorphic Encryption and why is it important?
The latest developments
What this might mean for the IAASB
What is Homomorphic Encryption? Why is it important?
Homomorphic Encryption (HE) is a set of algorithms that allows computations to be done on encrypted data without the need for decryption. Homomorphic encryption lets data be protected while “in use”, so analysis can be run directly on encrypted information without disclosing it and providing complete confidentiality during analysis.
Source: What is Homomorphic Encryption?, OpenMined
There are two main types of homomorphic encryption, Partial Homomorphic Encryption, which supports only a single operation over encrypted data, and Fully Homomorphic Encryption, which supports multiple operations. Federated Learning (FL) is another privacy-enhancing technology that distributes machine learning across devices or servers, thereby reducing latency and security risk whilst protecting privacy.
Fully Homomorphic Encryption: Why it Matters, IBM News, three-minute watch
Homomorphic encryption has many potential benefits for a wide range of industries from healthcare to financial services. From an audit and assurance perspective, there are several areas where homomorphic encryption can be leveraged.
Using aggregated data tosecurely achieve common goals –Audit firms or other organizations that may perceive privacy or confidentiality risks when working together could collaborate using encrypted data to achieve a common goal such as developing fraud pattern detection applications. Using homomorphic encryption, encrypted data sets from multiple sources could be linked together, used to train an AI application, and develop a technology product for all parties to use.
Enabling use of third parties without compromising data privacy – Homomorphic encryption may enable audit practitioners to leverage third parties with greater analytics capabilities or expertise to perform analysis on encrypted data to support audit procedures—an approach that would be difficult if not impossible without the encryption technology.
Enhancing effectiveness of cross-border audits – Homomorphic encryption could be used to enable data analysis across borders while respecting data residency and privacy laws. This would be particularly beneficial to group audits with components in jurisdictions with strict data residency restrictions.
Greater capability to perform benchmarking – Homomorphic encryption could be used to provide benchmarks across industries, including competitive companies, without exposing market sensitive data. Benchmarking data may be used when performing an audit, for example when performing analytical procedures.
Mitigating bias whilst stress testing models – Using homomorphic encryption, machine learning models and algorithms could be stress tested using encrypted data sets, so the data could not be fitted to the model ahead of time.
All these areas focus on homomorphic encryption’s ability to increase the data analysis that can be done while still ensuring data security and privacy. As the technology gains wider traction, it offers audit and assurance practitioners opportunities to increase their analytical capabilities and leverage the specialized skills of other entities or parties, without compromising data privacy.
Recent Noteworthy Developments in Homomorphic Encryption
This section is designed to provide examples of recent developments that may signal future disruption in this area. It is not a complete list of all activities in Homomorphic Encryption. For a reminder of Key Venture Capital and Investment terms please refer to the first Market Scan.
1. Big player activity
Homomorphic Encryption is gaining traction and growing fast. Top companies, such as Intel, Microsoft and Google, are leveraging the power of this technology and working to develop its use in various sectors of the economy.
Study shows growing interest in homomorphic encryption technologies
A December 2021 study by Deloitte noted 19 different “publicly announced pilots, products, and proofs of concept for homomorphic encryption”. Companies that are leading these pilots include large companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, IBM, and more. Finance, health, and social care currently dominate the pilot projects, but the expectation is that more industries will reap the benefits from the technology as it continues to gain leverage. These pilots also present opportunities for the audit and assurance industry to capitalize on the power of homomorphic encryption and how the using data encryption may contribute to or enhance the performance of quality audit or assurance engagements.
Intel and Microsoft announce collaboration on security technology
Intel and Microsoft have partnered together as part of a DARPA program to focus on reducing the overhead that is associated with using homomorphic encryption. To reap the benefits of this technology, it is important that it is both accessible and affordable. Both Intel and Microsoft’s investment in time and research in homomorphic encryption reveals the importance that both companies see in the technology’s ability to change the working world. As these large companies continue their research and testing, it may not be long before homomorphic encryption is accessible to companies of all sizes.
2. Start-up activity
As homomorphic encryption becomes more prominent, there have been a few key start-ups that have spearheaded its development, including those highlighted below.
Duality advances Homomorphic Encryption Landscape
Duality, a leader in enabling privacy-enhanced collaboration on sensitive data launched their open-source fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) library, OpenFHE, in July 2022. This was a collaborative project with other leaders in cryptography including Intel, Samsung, University of California-San Diego and MIT. OpenFHE is considered a next generation open-source FHE software library providing even greater security, robust privacy protection and wider useability.
Enveil announces new encrypted training solution
Enveil, a start-up company founded in 2016, has been a key leader in developing homomorphic encryption and federated learning technologies. In June 2022, Enveil announced a new solution called ZeroReveal ML Encrypted Training (ZMET), which enables encrypted federated learning and usage of decentralized datasets for machine learning applications.
New start-up sees web3 opportunity using homomorphic encryption
Brand new start-up, Sunscreen, just raised $4.65 million in seed funding to develop advanced privacy technology for the next generation of the world wide web, web3. Currently zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), which allow for a transaction to be verified on a blockchain without the underlying data being shared, are seen as the main solution for improving privacy in web3 but require significant processing power. However, co-founder and CEO of Sunscreen, Ravital Solomon, thinks “fully homomorphic encryption is even more promising in its potential to bolster privacy in web3.”
What this might mean for the IAASB
The IAASB is interested in maintaining its collective knowledgebase on digital technologies (including on specific sub-topics such as homomorphic encryption), promoting digital readiness and enablement through its engagement with stakeholders, and encouraging action by others to supplement and support the IAASB’s standard-setting activities. The IAASB is also keen to explore how technologies could be used to enhance interaction with auditing standards. Subject to IAASB’s work plan decisions, possible use cases of digital technologies for audited entities and audit engagements might provide input to further modernize IAASB’s standards to be adaptable to and reflect the current business and audit environment (while recognizing that the standards would address digital technologies in a principles-based manner).
Access to appropriate and reliable data is fundamental to being able to use automated tools and techniques in the audit. Considerations around data protection and privacy are key to this approach and homomorphic encryption presents a potential solution to current data access restrictions.
Homomorphic Encryption also offers opportunities for those in audit and assurance to develop advanced analytics, machine learning and AI technologies through enabling more options for data management.
However, using this technology may present unique practical challenges with applying certain principles set out in existing standards that address aspects of, for example, quality management, audit evidence, service organizations and using the work of others which may indicate the need for additional guidance. Given the nascent nature of this technology it is too early to fully comprehend the practical implications related to its use, but the IAASB will continue to monitor developments in this area.
Scientists at the University of Texas have developed an ink containing polymers that can store data and have used it to write a letter containing a hidden message. “The idea of writing a message but the real, hidden message is contained in the molecular structure of the ink is fascinating, although maybe not the most practical method,” says Alan Woodward at the University of Surrey, UK.
What do you think about this bulletin?
Please take the time to fill out our quick survey to let us know your thoughts about this bulletin, how it can be improved and what you would like to hear about going forward.
The IPSASB held its third meeting of the year in Lisbon, Portugal on September 12-16, 2022.
Measurement
The IPSASB confirmed the principles related to Current Operational Value (COV) and discussed their practical application. The IPSASB will next focus on refining the COV definition and clarifying the drafting in the authoritative and non-authoritative text based on the decisions made in September.
The IPSASB completed its review of responses to ED 76, Conceptual Framework Update: Chapter 7, Measurement of Assets and Liabilities in Financial Statements. The IPSASB decided not to include replacement cost in an updated Chapter 7. The IPSASB also decided to retain the approach proposed in ED 76 whereby value in use is discussed in the context of impairment, but left to be defined in the relevant IPSAS.
ED 78, Property, Plant, And Equipment
The IPSASB completed its detailed review of the responses to ED 78, Property, Plant, and Equipment. The IPSASB agreed that the primary objective for why an entity holds an asset guides the selection of the measurement basis, and the measurement model shall be applied to the entire class of property, plant, and equipment.
Revenue and Transfer Expenses
The IPSASB finished discussing all principle-related Revenue and Transfer Expenses issues. In particular, the Board agreed to strengthen the consistency between the transfer expense accounting and presentation requirements with those throughout existing IPSAS. The IPSASB also reviewed the revised authoritative text of the draft Transfer Expenses IPSAS, which reflects the revised principles developed in previous meetings.
Reporting Sustainability Program Information
The IPSASB approved ED 83, Reporting Sustainability Program Information, which proposes additional guidance to RPG 1, Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of an Entity’s Finances, and RPG 3, Reporting Service Performance Information. The additional guidance proposes illustrative examples and implementation guidance to clarify the application of key concepts in the guidance to reporting on sustainability program information. ED 83 will be exposed for a 60-day period from the date of publication.
Other Lease–Type Arrangements
The IPSASB discussed the arrangements identified in the responses to the Request for Information, Concessionary Leases and Other Arrangements Similar to Leases. The IPSASB agreed these arrangements fell within the scope of existing IPSAS and decided to publish a feedback statement, or similar document, highlighting this guidance. The IPSASB decided the scope of IPSAS 43, Leases should not be expanded beyond contracts.
Differential Reporting
The IPSASB reviewed several differential reporting models. The different approaches adopted by various jurisdictions allowed the Board to gain a better understanding as to the various practices worldwide. The IPSASB will continue its research and follow developments as it looks to develop a differential reporting model that can be applied globally for the public sector.
Next Meeting
The next full meeting of the IPSASB will take place in December 2022 in Toronto, Canada. For more information, or to register as an observer, visit the IPSASB website.
2022 Public Sector Standard Setters Forum
On 19-20 September, 2022, the IPSASB welcomed standard setters from around the world to its 4th Public Sector Standards Setters Forum hosted by the Order Certified Accountants (OCC) in Cascais, Portugal. Attendees collaborated to scope the IPSASB's new guidance projects, shape the IPSASB's next 5-year strategy, and engage in lively discussions around the advancement of sustainability reporting in the public sector and beyond. Thank you to our attendees, speakers, and fantastic host for bringing your energy and commitment to strengthening public sector accounting globally.
Welcome to the fourth market scan from the IAASB's Disruptive Technology team. Building on our previous work, we will issue a Market Scan on topics from the report approximately every two to three months. Market Scans will consist of exciting trends, including new developments, corporate and start-up innovation, noteworthy investments and what it all might mean for the IAASB.
In this Market Scan, we explore natural language processing (NLP), a technology that has applications within Accessing Information & Data (NLP and Computer Vision for Digitizing Documents) and within Assessing Internal Controls (Optical Character Recognition, NLP and Machine Learning for Intelligent Document and Voice Analysis). This technology has the potential to impact many areas of the audit—enhancing the way auditors work and providing opportunities for greater insight.
We cover:
What is natural language processing and why is it important?
The latest developments
What this might mean for the IAASB
What is Natural Language Processing? Why Is It Important?
Natural language processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence that is concerned with giving computers the ability to understand, interpret and manipulate human language, both written text and spoken words.
Artificial Intelligence Technologies with Natural Language Processing highlighted
NLP uses a combination of technologies, including computational linguistics (rule-based modeling of human language), statistical modelling and machine learning. NLP involves both natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG). See the video from Simplilearn below for an explanation of how the technologies fit together.
What Is NLP And How Does It Work? | Simplilearn, five-minute watch
There are many benefits of having technology that can fully understand human speech and text (including tone and meaning), determine the right response and provide that response in a human-like format. These include:
Enabling better decision support through analysis of large quantities of unstructured data (e.g., emails, documents, social media) to understand sentiment, identify text similarity or discover specific themes.
Supporting improved communication through effective translation applications (e.g., Google Translate)
Providing around-the-clock support to customers, clients, users and other help-seekers through chatbots, voice assistants and applications that use semantic search functionality
Assisting with efficient documentation through generative language applications that can automatically create text content, such as high-level insights or summaries.
In an audit and assurance context, NLP-based technologies can be utilized to support and enhance auditor activities. For example:
Providing auditor assistance by delivering relevant guidance to the auditor, when and where they need it, through voice assistants and help bots.
Enriching risk identification and assessment activities by providing valuable insights about the entity and its environment, from analysis of unstructured data from a variety of sources such as regulatory notices, social media, and news articles.
Supporting understanding the entity's internal controls by extracting and summarizing what has been written down in process documents, emails, articles, and from employee inquiries.
Augmenting documentation activities through automatic text generation, for example, by providing commentary from data analysis results. See the below video from Wordsmith for an example of technology that can do this.
Wordsmith: Extend the Power of Tableau, Automated Insights, two-minute watch
These technologies offer opportunities, such as those described above, to the auditor or the audited entity, which could reduce manual, time-intensive activities; enhance the effectiveness of certain procedures, tasks, or actions; and augment decision making. However, they are not without their risks and adoption needs to go hand in hand with a recognition that imperfections in outputs could arise.
Recent Noteworthy Developments in Natural Language Processing
These recent developments may signal future disruption in this area; this is not a complete list of all activities in the natural language processing. For a reminder of Key Venture Capital and Investment terms please refer to the first Market Scan.
1. Transformers—boosting NLP development
Transformers are deep learning models used in natural language processing for translation and text summarization. Recent developments have seen these technologies trained with large language datasets, leading to a growth in pre-trained systems like Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). Some notable developments include:
GPT-3 from OpenAI is a hugely popular model that can generate large amounts of text based on a small amount of text input. It is used in many copywriting and content generation applications available today. However, the solution has gained notoriety for the machine learning bias it picked up from the human bias in the internet text it learned from. The Gender Bias Inside GPT-3 | Made by McKinney, five-minute read
What is GPT-3 (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3) – Tech Target, three-minute watch
Google’s BERT is the underlying model for the Google search engine—and due to be replaced by MUM, a Multitask Unified Model, during 2022 and described as 1,000 times more powerful than BERT.
Megatron-Turing NLG is the latest model from Microsoft and Nvidia and described as the largest and most powerful generative language model with 530 billion parameters.
Enterpret, a start-up founded by brothers Varun and Arnav Sharma, is developing natural language models to improve insights from customer feedback. This technology, which is focused on enabling more informed product development, could have widespread application across all industries with digital presence.
Cohere builds large language models and makes them available through an Application Programming Interface (API). In November 2021 Google Cloud announced a multiyear partnership with Cohere to provide infrastructure for development of their platform.
This popular Y-Combinator backed startup has built an AI copywriting assistant to write original, creative content including blog articles and social media.
OpenAI, which developed GPT-3 for generating text, has leveraged this technology to develop a tool called Copilot to help generate code. It is part of a growing trend in developing technology that enables everyone to become a code creator.
What this might mean for the IAASB
The IAASB is interested in maintaining its collective knowledge base on digital technologies, including on specific sub-topics such as NLP, promoting digital readiness and enablement through its engagement with stakeholders, and encouraging action by others to supplement and support standard-setting activities.
The IAASB is also keen to explore how technologies, such as NLP, could be used to enhance interaction with auditing standards. Subject to the IAASB’s work plan decisions, possible use cases of digital technologies, such as NLP for audited entities and audit engagements, might provide input for further modernizing the IAASB’s standards to be adaptable to and reflect the current business and audit environment (while recognizing that the standards would address digital technologies in a principles-based manner).
NLP-based technologies present exciting opportunities for auditors to enhance the effectiveness of procedures, tasks, or actions. Widespread adoption is also likely to be more straightforward than for other technologies as it can often be introduced with limited training requirements. From the perspective of both an auditor performing an audit engagement and a firm’s quality management around the technology resources used by engagement teams, the opportunities as well as the potential challenges should be considered.
Technologies that make suggestions to the auditor, for example, about risks they may not have considered (using data extraction) or on appropriate next steps in the audit process (using a chatbot or voice assistant) offer just-in-time guidance but may give rise to automation bias. That is, the tendency to over-rely on automated aids or, more broadly, the outputs from technology solutions. In addition, challenges are likely to exist around the availability of suitable data sets for training these support technologies in order to provide appropriate recommendations given that facts and circumstances will differ from audit to audit.
Technologies that help auditors create documentation, for example, those that summarize documents or those that provide commentary on data analysis, warrant consideration about how they may blur the lines of responsibility. With these technologies often acting so seamlessly with humans, reviewers of documentation prepared by a combination of computers and humans may find it difficult to determine who did what and therefore decide on the appropriate level of scrutiny required. A principles-based approach continues to recognize that the responsibility for documentation remains that of the auditor, including that the documentation provides a sufficient and appropriate record of the work performed and conclusions reached.
Deepmind, the Google-owned AI company behind the AlphaGo program that was the first to beat a professional Go player, has now developed a new tool called Ithaca. Ithaca is a machine learning model that guesses what the missing words might be in incomplete ancient Greek texts potentially shedding light on the meaning of inscriptions that are thousands of years old.
What do you think about this bulletin?
Please take the time to fill out our quick survey to let us know your thoughts about this bulletin, how it can be improved and what you would like to hear about going forward.
The IPSASB held its first meeting of the year in New York on March 21-25, 2022.
Sustainability Reporting
The IPSASB approved its global consultation on developing a sustainability reporting framework for the public sector. The IPSASB plans to launch this pivotal consultation in early May, alongside its Natural Resources Consultation Paper and the IPSASB Mid-Period Work Program Consultation Feedback Statement.
Advancing public sector sustainability reporting is both important and urgent. The IPSASB is pleased to be able to lead the debate. Watch this space for launch details and how to get involved.
Mid-Period Work Program Consultation
The IPSASB agreed to add new projects to its 2022 work program:
Presentation of Financial Statements; Differential Reporting;
Reporting Sustainability Program Information; and
Advancing Public Sector Sustainability Reporting Consultation Paper.
As resources become available in 2022, work on the above projects will commence.
The landscape for IPSASB’s work has changed since the Mid-Period Consultation was published, resulting in fewer resources being available than originally anticipated. The IPSASB will continue to monitor work program progress and resource availability in 2023, to look for opportunities to commence work on the limited scope projects proposed in the Mid-Period Consultation, which were strongly supported by constituents.
Natural Resources
The IPSASB approved the Consultation Paper, Natural Resources, which will be published in May 2022, and will be open for comment until October2022. The Consultation Paper includes the IPSASB’s preliminary views on issues related to the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure ofnatural resources, usingexamples of subsoil resources, water, and living resources.
The IPSASB approved the project roadmap, including issuing an Exposure Draft as the next output for this project. The IPSASB also decided to analyze the arrangements from the perspectives of both:
Parties to the arrangements; and
The consolidated financial statements and separate financial statements.
The IPSASB plans to discuss concessionary leases and leases for zero or nominal consideration at the June meeting.
Revenue and Transfer Expenses
The IPSASB agreed to use the term ‘compliance obligation’to describe an entity’s legally binding obligation arising from revenue transaction with a binding arrangement. The IPSASB furtherdiscussed the implications of internal and external factors on the subsequent measurement of assets arising from binding arrangements. The IPSASB also continued discussing principles related to transfer expenses accounting, focusing on the timing and recognitionof transfer expenses in transactions with binding arrangements, and the allocation of consideration to the transferor’s transfer rights.
Measurement
The IPSASB performed a detailedreview of the responses to ED 77, Measurement. Respondents strongly supported most of the ED proposals. The IPSASB agreed to move forward with the proposals related to Fair Value and Cost of Fulfillment, and thatdisclosure requirements should be included in the relevant IPSAS. The proposed principles related to historical cost and the measurement model policy choice are areas where further clarification is needed.
Conceptual Framework-Phase I
The IPSASB reviewed responses to ED 76, Conceptual Framework Update: Chapter 7, Measurement of Assets and Liabilities in Financial Statements. The IPSASB decided to retain the three-level classification proposed in ED 76. However, the term ‘Subsequent Measurement Framework’will be adopted rather than ‘Measurement Hierarchy’.
The IPSASB decided to include fair value as defined in ED 76 and to delete market value. The IPSASB instructed staff to further analyze the case for deletionof net selling price, cost of release and assumption price.
Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
The IPSASB approved IPSAS 44, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations with an effective date of January 1, 2025. IPSAS 44 aligns with IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and provides the accounting requirements for assets held for sale and provides presentation and disclosure requirements for discontinued operations. IPSAS 44 is expected to be published in May 2022.
ISS Update
The IPSASB discussed the work done by the statistical community in updating the International Statistical Standards(ISS) and the IPSASB’s role in that process. The IPSASB also reviewed the new IPSAS-ISS Alignment Dashboard, which will be a standing agenda item for future meetings and captures the IPSASB’s long standing work to reduce unnecessary differences with statistical standards to make IPSAS information useful for statistical compilation purposes. The IPSASB discussed the importance of IPSAS-ISS alignment from both conceptual and practical perspectives.
Next Meeting
The next full meeting of the IPSASB will take place in June 2022. For more information, or to register as an observer, visit the IPSASB website (www.ipsasb.org).
Welcome to the third Market Scan from the IAASB's Disruptive Technology team. Building on our previous work, which included the Innovation Report created with Founders Intelligence and discussed at the January 2021 IAASB Meeting, we issue a Market Scan focusing on topics from the report approximately every two months. Market Scans consist of exciting trends, including new developments, corporate and start-up innovation, noteworthy investments and what it all might mean for the IAASB.
In this Market Scan, we explore Artificial Intelligence (AI), which is used in a broad range of technologies across the audit and assurance value chain. This Market Scan provides a high-level primer on Artificial Intelligence as it is one of the most significant and potentially disruptive technologies in audit and assurance. Future Market Scans will build on this by focusing on some of the specific AI-powered technologies highlighted below.
We will cover:
What is AI, including related concepts of machine learning and deep learning
AI use cases in audit and assurance
AI challenges
AI developments
What is Artificial Intelligence?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a broad discipline of computer science that refers to the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision making, and translation.
AI also describes a broad range of technologies shown in the diagram below. Many of the technologies we use every day contain one or more of these capabilities; for example, a smart speaker contains speech recognition (to turn our speech into text), natural language processing (NLP) (to understand the request and generate a response) and machine learning (to improve the quality of responses over time).
Overview of AI Technologies
Intelligence in this context is the ability to perceive or deduce information, retain it as knowledge and apply it to making decisions. In computers this is done by analyzing large quantities of data using advanced statistics (including probability analysis) to find patterns and make predictions.
Types of AI
Narrow AI (Today’s AI, weak)
General AI (Future AI, strong)
Applications that model human behavior to perform a specific task or function, e.g., face recognition, speech detection
Currently hypothetical but refers to machines that have full human cognitive abilities
What is an algorithm?
Algorithms are in use all around us, although the term may not be fully understood as frequently. Think of it as a recipe used by computers: a finite sequence of well-defined instructions, typically used to solve a class of specific problems or to perform a computation. An algorithm takes an input (e.g., a dataset) and generates an output (e.g., a pattern that it has found in the data). It is like taking your ingredients and following a recipe to bake a cake.
Algorithms are not exclusive to AI. They are likely used in every audit to complete procedures such as identifying sample sizes or performing data analytics, such as ratio or regression analysis.
What Is Machine Learning?
Machine learning is about using algorithms to guide predictions. The goal of the machine learning process is to create a model, which is based on one or more algorithms. The model is developed through training with the goal that the model should provide a high degree of predictability.
One of the earliest examples of a machine learning system was a computer checkers game created by Arthur Lee Samuel at IBM. Arthur demonstrated how machine learning could work by creating a computer function to measure the chance of winning based on the position of pieces on the board. The computer then used function to determine the move most likely to lead to a successful outcome, that is, winning. The computer learns by using the feedback from playing as its data and using Arthur’s function to guide its prediction model to get to a preferred outcome.
In its simplest form, machine learning requires a five-step process:
Get and organize the data
Choose a model (one or more algorithms)
Train the model (using training data, about 70% of your data set)
Evaluate the model (using test data, about 30% of your data set)
Fine-tune the model and implement
Machine Learning Process
The main challenges with implementation of machine learning are in relation to what data to use (and how to get it) and what model to use, that is, which algorithms to apply.
Machine learning approaches
There are three main types of learning approach used in machine learning; determining which approach to use largely depends on what data you have available.
Supervised learning is an approach used when large amounts of labelled data are available. This enables the technology to learn by comparing its results to the correct answer. There are effectively two types of algorithms that are used within supervised learning—one is classification, where you divide the dataset into common labels. A common form of classification algorithm is called Naïve Bayes Classifier, which is used in text analysis (e.g., for sentiment analysis, email spam detection). It uses frequency and patterns in data to come up with a prediction model based on probabilities.
The other type of algorithm used in supervised learning is regression, which finds continuous patterns in data. A common form of regression algorithm is linear regression, which shows the relationship between variables and uses this to predict outcomes based on inputs, e.g., predicting expected sales per square foot of sales floor space.
Unsupervised learning is used when the available data is unlabeled, so the algorithms used seek to put the data into groups. The most common approach is called Clustering, which is grouping similar items together and then iterating the model to get better results. There are a variety of quantitative methods, i.e., ways of grouping items. Common uses of unsupervised learning are customer segmentation for targeting marketing messages where similar customer characteristics are expected to share similar preferences.
Finally, Reinforcementlearning is commonly used in gaming and robotics, effectively learning through a process of trial and error to get the most effective outcome (such as winning the game or navigating successfully around a space).
Deep learning is a subfield of machine learning that uses neural networks for learning and bear some resemblance to how the human brain works. This way of processing data is more granular than with machine learning and involves more layers of analysis. Although the concept of deep learning has been around since the 1970s, its recent growth is due to the significant advancements in computing power. It is commonly used for speech and image recognition.
An artificial neural network ingests data through an input layer, processes it through a complex network (known as the hidden layer or layers) to provide an output. The word “hidden” in the hidden layer simply refers to the fact that the units in the layer are not visible to external systems and are “private” to the neural network.
Example of a neural network used to identify the number 4 (From Deep Learning with Python by Francois Chollet)
Each of the processing units in the network is called a neuron. A neuron is a container with an input value, a weighting, and a bias (which is a constant). These are computed together and then an activation function is applied, which is effectively a mathematical operation that normalizes the inputs and produces an output that is then passed onto neurons in the next layer.
The weightings along with the bias can change the way the neural networks operate and are used to refine the model to get to the preferred outcome.
The most common types of neural networks are called fully connected neural networks, referring to all the neurons having connections from layer to layer. Other neural networks include recurrent neural networks, convolutional neural networks and generative adversarial networks.
In Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), the function not only processes the input but also prior inputs across time. An example of this is with predictive text, as you start to type, different word options are presented based on what the system predicts you are typing.
In Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), data is processed in stages from easy to complex with each of the stages being a convolution. CNNs are often used in computer vision applications such as image recognition software.
Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are a relatively new but powerful class of neural network used for unsupervised learning. They are made up of a system of two neural network models (a generator and a discriminator) that compete with each other and are able to analyze, capture and copy the variations in a dataset. It is this technology that gave rise to creation of deepfakes; they have also begun to be used by the financial services sector to help with fraud identification.
There are many ways that AI may be deployed to support the audit process.
Audit Planning
Resource optimization using AI technology to analyze staff profiles and experience to bring together the best team for the type of audit engagement
Client acceptance procedures using AI to analyze data from non-traditional sources,such as social media, emails, phone calls, public statements from entity management, etc., to identify potential risks relevant to client acceptance and continuance assessments.
Understanding the entity and its systems, and identifying risks
Using natural language processing and machine learning AI technologies to analyze structured and unstructured information, such as global regulatory notices, industry reports, regulatory penalties, news, public forums, etc., to detect risks of audit relevance
Intelligent document analysis, such as optical character recognition natural language processing and machine learning technologies, to derive insight from unstructured data sources like email, documents, transcribed voice, images, etc. to support understanding of the entity’s information system and related controls.
Quickly and more efficiently understanding the entity's internal controls by summarizing and extracting what has been documented in process documents, emails, articles, and from employee inquiries.
AI-powered behavioral analytics to identify suspicious or unusual entity employee behavior and intent, such as data exfiltration, employee collusion or abuse from privileged users.
Enhancing an audit team's judgments on higher-risk areas of audit engagements by using AI to identify common risks relevant to entity’s industry, regulatory environment, operating locations and other external factors.
Substantive Procedures
AI tools, benefiting from increases in the quality and quantity of available “training” data, can be applied to data sets to algorithmically identify outliers and anomalous data and to perform predictive analytics for use in areas such as testing large transaction populations, auditing accounting estimates and going concern assessments.
Document processing, review and analysis by using optical character recognition to identify and extract key details from contracts (e.g., leases) and other documents (e.g., invoices)
Inventory and physical asset verification procedures through use of drones with computer vision (image recognition) particularly for larger capital assets, such as trucks, or the inspection of large-scale business sites, such as wind farms.
Conclusion Procedures
AI technologies to support auditors’ work on financial statement disclosures enabling easier identification of missing disclosure requirements and non-compliance.
AI technologies to support tick and tie of underlying audit work through to financial statements and related disclosures
Some of these technologies will be explored in more detail in future Market Scans.
Many organizations are expanding their use of AI across parts of their business with the goal of driving operational efficiencies, better informed decision making and generating growth through innovation. As a result, it is likely that this technology will become a relevant consideration when performing audit procedures, particularly regarding risk identification and assessment, and risk response activities.
Where AI is deployed, whether by the auditor in carrying out their procedures or by an audited entity within their business operations, the associated risks need to be identified and appropriately managed. Many assurance firms and organizations have developed methodologies that provide a framework for identifying and managing AI related risks. In September 2021, COSO issued new guidance setting out how to apply “the COSO framework and principles to help implement and scale artificial intelligence”.
This guidance identifies five areas of AI related risks:
Bias and reliability breakdowns due to inappropriate or non-representative data
Inability to understand or explain AI model outputs
Inappropriate use of data
Vulnerabilities to adversarial attack to obtain data or otherwise manipulate the AI model
Societal stresses due to rapid application and transformation of AI technologies
It concludes that appropriate risk management is needed to ensure that AI solutions are “trusted, tried and true”.
Auditing AI may require a different set of skills to those currently applied in today’s audits and many firms are updating their recruitment strategies, training curricula and audit methodologies to respond to the growing need for AI competencies. Future Market Scans will explore some of these challenges in more detail.
The global AI market is expected to achieve a compound annual growth rate of nearly 40% over the next five years and whilst AI technologies such as natural language processing and speech recognition are maturing, others such as deep learning and Generative AI have significant scope for development.
Here are some recent noteworthy developments:
Regulation and Explainable AI
One of the issues that has arisen with AI is around the negative impact of biases in algorithms and the harm that this can cause. In a recent survey more than one in three companies surveyed disclosed that they had suffered losses (revenue, customers or staff) due to AI bias in their algorithms. In response, there is an expectation regulation will be established in the near future. The EU, in its white paper, “On Artificial Intelligence—A European Approach to Excellence and Trust”, noted that explainability is a key factor to improving trust in AI. Many companies are, therefore, expected to look to implement explainable AI in which the results of the solution can be understood by humans.
Efficient AI
DeepMind, the company behind the AlphaGo program that was the first to beat a professional Go player, has developed an AI large language model—that is, a statistical tool to predict words—called RETRO (Retrieval-Enhanced Transformer). This AI technology, built to generate convincing text, chat with humans and answer questions is said to match the performance of neural networks 25 times its size through use of a text database.
Decision Intelligence
One of the top technology trends for 2022 noted by Gartner is decision intelligence, which is using AI to enhance and support human decision making. Peak.ai, a UK based start-up, raised US $75m in series C funding in August 2021 to enable it to build out its “decision intelligence” platform to expand into new markets and help non-tech companies make AI-based decisions.
Funny Story
AI argues for and against itself in Oxford Union debate: Megatron, an AI developed by Google and Nvidia, was given access to huge quantities of data to enable it to both defend and argue against the motion, “This house believes that AI will never be ethical”. It’s not clear which argument was more compelling!
What do you think about this bulletin?
Please take the time to fill out our quick survey to let us know your thoughts about this bulletin, how it can be improved and what you would like to hear about going forward.
What next?
Our next Market Scan bulletin will be distributed in April 2022.